🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

The WHO in fact recommends a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.