🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that could add several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to set aside a district court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the boundaries drawn after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action is part of a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican hold. Usually, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas AG welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic officials criticized the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top Democratic leader said the court had yet again eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.