🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.